Ohio Supreme Court, 2006

Seven Seventeen HB Philadelphia No. 2 v. Franklin County Board of Revision

Seven Seventeen HB Philadelphia No. 2 v. Franklin County Board of Revision
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 1, 2006 · Connor, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton
111 Ohio St. 3d 1215

Seven Seventeen HB Philadelphia No. 2 v. Franklin County Board of Revision

Dissenting Opinion

Pfeifer, J.,

dissents for the reason stated in his dissent in Olympic Steel, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 110 Ohio St.3d 1242, 2006-Ohio-4091, 852 N.E.2d 178, ¶ 5.

Martin Hughes & Associates, Martin J. Hughes III, and Jackie Lynn Hager, for appellant and cross-appellee. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, L.L.P., Greg R. Wehrer, and Steven F. Mount, for appellee and cross-appellant.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The appeal and the cross-appeal are dismissed, sua sponte, on the authority of Olympic Steel, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 110 Ohio St.3d 1242, 2006-Ohio-4091, 852 N.E.2d 178.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.