Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2006

Taylor Bldg. Corp. of Am. v. Benfield

Taylor Bldg. Corp. of Am. v. Benfield
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 27, 2006 · Accept, Appeal, Connor, Donnell, Lanzinger, Law, Pfeifer, Proposition, Propositions, Resnick, Stratton
112 Ohio St. 3d 1418; 859 N.E.2d 557

Taylor Bldg. Corp. of Am. v. Benfield

Opinion of the Court

Clermont App. No. CA2005-09-083, 2006-Ohio-4428. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I and cause consolidated with 2006-2043, Taylor Bldg. Corp. of Am. v. Benfield, Clermont App. No. CA2005-09-083, 2006-Ohio-4428.

Resnick and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., would also accept the appeal on all other Propositions of Law. O’Connor, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. Pfeifer, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ'., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑