Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Garfield

Ohio Supreme Court
Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Garfield, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1216 (Ohio 2007)
Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Stratton

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Garfield

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Robert Earl Garfield, Attorney Registration No. 0001873, last known business address in Pepper Pike, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of May 3, 2006, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of eighteen months with a starting date of March 28, 2005, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. '

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Garfield, 109 Ohio St.3d 103, 2006-Ohio-1935, 846 N.E.2d 45.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Cuyahoga County Bar Association v. Garfield
Status
Published