Ohio Supreme Court, 2007

Stewart v. Lake Cty. Historical Soc., Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 7, 2007 · Accept, Appeal, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Law, Moyer, Only, Pfeifer, Proposition, Stratton

112 Ohio St. 3d 1469; 861 N.E.2d 143

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Stewart v. Lake County Historical Society, Inc. (Ohio 2009)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Lake App. No. 2004-L-164, 2006-Ohio-4822. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and III; cause held on Proposition of Law No. Ill only for the decision in 2006-0189, Uddin v. Embassy Suites Hotel, Franklin App. No. 04AP-754, 2005-0hio-6613; and briefing schedule stayed as to Proposition of Law No. III.

Moyer, C.J., Stratton and Cupp, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. O’Donnell, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. Ill only. Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.