Ohio Supreme Court, 2007

Advent v. Allstate Ins.

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 28, 2007 · App, Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Hold, Ohio, Shay, Stratton

112 Ohio St. 3d 1488; 862 N.E.2d 115

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Kudla v. Wendt, Unpublished Decision (12-13-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Franklin App. No. 06AP-103, 2006-Ohio-5522 and 2006-0hio-6791. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed December 21, 2006:

“Can the S.B. No. 97 amendments to R.C. 3937.18 be incorporated into an insurance policy dining a two-year guarantee period that commenced subsequent to the S.B. No. 267 amendments to R.C. 3937.18 and R.C. 3937.31, but prior to the S.B. No. 97 amendments?”

Lundberg Stratton and Cupp, JJ., would also hold the cause for the decision in 2005-2277, Shay v. Shay, Fulton App. No. F-05-008, 2005-Ohio-5874. O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is Storer v. Sharp, Cuyahoga App. No. 86525, 2006-Ohio-1577.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2006-2271, Advent v. Allstate Ins. Co., Franklin App. No. 06AP-103, 2006-Ohio-5522 and 2006-Ohio-6791.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.