Ohio Supreme Court, 2007

State v. Huffman

State v. Huffman
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 19, 2007 · Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Stratton
114 Ohio St. 3d 433
State v. Huffman

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed with respect to the issues presented in Proposition of Law Nos. I and II on the authority of State v. Tooley, 114 Ohio St.3d 366, 2007-Ohio-3698, 872 N.E.2d 894.

{¶ 2} As to Proposition of Law No. Ill, the cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.