Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2007

State v. Pierce

State v. Pierce
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 12, 2007 · Accept, Appeal, Cupp, Donnell, Holding, Lanzinger, Law, Moyer, Nos, Only, Pfeifer, Proposition, Propositions, Stratton
116 Ohio St. 3d 1437; 877 N.E.2d 989

State v. Pierce

Opinion of the Court

Cuyahoga App. No. 88470, 2007-Ohio-3665. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. Ill and IV; cause held for the decision in 2006-2187, Hyle v. Porter, Hamilton App. No. C-050768, 170 Ohio App.3d 710, 2006-Ohio-5454; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. Ill only. Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on all other Propositions of Law. Lanzinger, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. V and VI. Cupp, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II without holding.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑