Ohio Supreme Court, 2007

DiCenzo v. A-Best Prods. Co.

DiCenzo v. A-Best Prods. Co.
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 26, 2007 · Accept, Appeal, Cupp, Law, Pfeifer, Proposition, Stratton
116 Ohio St. 3d 1455; 878 N.E.2d 33

DiCenzo v. A-Best Prods. Co.

Opinion of the Court

Cuyahoga App. No. 88583, 2007-0hio-3270. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II.

Lundberg Stratton and Cupp, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Motion for admission pro hac vice of Joni M. Mangino by Bruce P. Mandel granted.

Motions for admission pro hac vice of Mark A. Behrens and Cary Silverman by Victor E. Schwartz granted.

Motions for admission pro hac vice of Diana Nickerson Jacobs, Mark C. Meyer, David B. Rodes, and Jason T. Shipp by Joseph J. Cirilano granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.