Ohio Supreme Court, 2008

State v. Sessler

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 6, 2008 · Connor, Donnell, Lanzinger

116 Ohio St. 3d 1505; 880 N.E.2d 481

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Sanders (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
State v. Ligon (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
State v. Thomas (Ohio Ct. App. 2024)
State v. Jones (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
State v. Edwards (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Crawford App. No. 3-06-23, 2007-Ohio-4931. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed November 30, 2007:

“Is the holding in State v. Pelfrey, 112 Ohio St.3d 422, applicable to charging statutes that contain separate sub-parts with distinct offense levels?”

O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

The conflict ease is State v. Kepiro, Franklin App. No. 06AP-1302, 2007-Ohio-4593.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2007-2030, State v. Sessler, Crawford App. No. 3-06-23, 2007-Ohio-4931.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.