Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2008

State v. Moore

State v. Moore
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 13, 2008 · Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyek, Pfeifer, Stratton
117 Ohio St. 3d 69; 881 N.E.2d 860

State v. Moore

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} As to Proposition of Law No. II of the cross-appeal, the cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Lisa Reitz Williamson, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for cross-appellee. Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and John T. Martin, Assistant Public Defender, for cross-appellant.

{¶ 2} As to Proposition of Law No. Ill of the cross-appeal, the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further consideration in light of our decision in State v. Crager, 116 Ohio St.3d 369, 2007-Ohio-6840, 879 N.E.2d 745.

{¶ 3} As to Proposition of Law No. VII of the cross-appeal, the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further consideration in light of our decision in State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470.

Moyek, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑