Ohio Supreme Court, 2008

Disciplinary Counsel v. Rafidi

Disciplinary Counsel v. Rafidi
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 3, 2008 · Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Stratton
117 Ohio St. 3d 1226

Disciplinary Counsel v. Rafidi

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Joseph F. Rafidi, Attorney Registration No. 0073061, last known business address in Youngstown, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 25, 2007, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4}'It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Rafidi, 114 Ohio St.3d 336, 2007-Ohio-3674, 872 N.E.2d 265.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.