Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2008

State v. Winn

State v. Winn
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 20, 2008 · Accept, App, Appeal, Cabrales, Connor, Cross, Cupp, Donnell, Hold, III, Lanzinger, Law, Moyer, Ohio, Pfeifer, Proposition, Stratton
117 Ohio St. 3d 1405; 881 N.E.2d 273

State v. Winn

Opinion of the Court

Montgomery App. No. 21710, 173 Ohio App.3d 202, 2007-Ohio-4327. Discretionary cross-appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, and Cupp, JJ., would also hold the cause for the decision in 2007-0595 and 2007-0651, State v. Cabrales, Hamilton App. No. C-050682, 2007-Ohio-857. Lanzinger, J., would also accept the cross-appeal on Proposition of Law No. III. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Discretionary appeal not accepted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑