Ohio Supreme Court, 2008

State v. Hairston

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 26, 2008 · Accept, Appeal, Cross, Cupp, III, Lanzinger, Moyer, Nos, Proposition

117 Ohio St. 3d 1441; 883 N.E.2d 458

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Hairston, 08ap-640 (3-3-2009) (Ohio Ct. App. 2009)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Franklin App. Nos. 07AP-160 and 07AP-161, 2007-Ohio-5928. Discretionary appeal and cross-appeal not accepted.

Moyer, C.J., dissents and would accept the cross-appeal. Lanzinger, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II and the cross-appeal. Cupp, J., dissents and would accept the cross-appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. II and III.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.