In re T.R.
In re T.R.
117 Ohio St. 3d 1456; 884 N.E.2d 65
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re shepard/lane Children, C-080229 (7-9-2008) (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
- In re G. K., 24276 (10-22-2008) (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
- In re J.N., 24090 (7-9-2008) (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Montgomery App. No. 22291, 2007-Ohio-6593. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 1 of the court of appeals’ Decision and Entry filed February 4, 2008:
“Does R.C. 2151.413(E) require a children services board to file an adoption plan with the court, prior to the court granting permanent custody of a minor child?”
The conflict cases are In re McCutchen (Mar. 8, 1991), Knox App. No. 90-CA-25, and In re Cavender (Mar. 9, 2001), Madison App. No. CA2000-06-37.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.