Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2008

State v. Harris

State v. Harris
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 7, 2008 · App, Grant, Hairston, Hold, Lanzinger, Law, Motion, Ohio, Pfeifer, Proposition
117 Ohio St. 3d 1501; 885 N.E.2d 957

State v. Harris

Opinion of the Court

Hamilton App. No. C-060989. Reported at 117 Ohio St.3d 1426, 2008-Ohio-969, 882 N.E.2d 446. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent and would grant the motion as to Proposition of Law No. II and hold the cause for the decision in 2007-0394, State v. Hairston, Franklin App. No. 06AP-420, 2007-Ohio-143.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑