Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2008

State v. Balderson

State v. Balderson
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 14, 2008 · Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Stratton
118 Ohio St. 3d 194; 887 N.E.2d 347

State v. Balderson

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} As to Proposition of Law No. I, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Simpkins, 117 Ohio St.3d 420, 2008-Ohio-1197, 884 N.E.2d 568.

{¶ 2} As to Proposition of Law No. II, the cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑