Ohio Supreme Court, 2008

Chojnacki v. Rogers

Chojnacki v. Rogers
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided August 6, 2008 · Donnell
119 Ohio St. 3d 1405; 891 N.E.2d 767

Chojnacki v. Rogers

Opinion of the Court

Warren App. No. CA2008-03-040. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Entry filed May 5, 2008:

“[Wlhether a decision denying a request for appointment of counsel in a reclassification hearing held pursuant to Ohio’s version of the Adam Walsh Act, Senate Bill 10, is a final appealable order.”

Dissenting Opinion

O’Donnell, J.,

dissents.

The conflict case is King v. State (Mar. 19, 2008), Miami App. No. 2008-CA-2.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2008-0992, Chojnacki v. Rogers, Warren App. No. CA2008-03040.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.