Chojnacki v. Rogers
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- In re Objection to Reclassification Brown, 9-08-18 (10-20-2008) (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Warren App. No. CA2008-03-040. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Entry filed May 5, 2008:
“[Wlhether a decision denying a request for appointment of counsel in a reclassification hearing held pursuant to Ohio’s version of the Adam Walsh Act, Senate Bill 10, is a final appealable order.”
Dissenting Opinion
dissents.
The conflict case is King v. State (Mar. 19, 2008), Miami App. No. 2008-CA-2.
Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2008-0992, Chojnacki v. Rogers, Warren App. No. CA2008-03040.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.