Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2008

State v. Pierce

State v. Pierce
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 9, 2008 · Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Ferguson, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Stated, Stratton
120 Ohio St. 3d 321; 898 N.E.2d 960

State v. Pierce

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Ferguson, 120 Ohio St.3d 7, 2008-Ohio-4824, 896 N.E.2d 110.

Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Lanzinger, J., in State v. Ferguson.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑