State v. Lupardus

Ohio Supreme Court
State v. Lupardus, 2009 Ohio 5860 (Ohio 2009)
Per Curiam

State v. Lupardus

Opinion

[Cite as State v. Lupardus, 123 Ohio St.3d 1216, 2009-Ohio-5860.]

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. LUPARDUS, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Lupardus, 123 Ohio St.3d 1216, 2009-Ohio-5860.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently accepted. (No. 2008-2487 — Submitted October 20, 2009 — Decided November 10, 2009.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Washington County, No. 08CA31, 2008-Ohio-5960. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted. PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, and O’DONNELL, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., and LANZINGER and CUPP, JJ., would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals on the authority of State v. Geeslin, 116 Ohio St.3d 252, 2007-Ohio-5239, 878 N.E.2d 1. __________________ Roland W. Riggs III, Marietta Law Director, and Mark C. Sleeper, Assistant Law Director, for appellee. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Sarah M. Schregardus, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Richard Cordray, Attorney General, Benjamin C. Mizer, Solicitor General, Kimberly A. Olson, Deputy Solicitor, and Jeffrey R. Loeser, Assistant Solicitor, urging affirmance for amicus curiae Ohio Attorney General. D. Timothy Huey; and Lyons & Lyons Co., L.P.A., and Jeffrey C. Meadows, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. ______________________

Reference

Status
Published