Ohio Supreme Court, 2009

Turner v. Brunsman

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided October 28, 2009 · Moyer, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp

2009 Ohio 5588; 123 Ohio St. 3d 445; 917 N.E.2d 269

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

State ex rel. Turner v. Corrigan (Ohio 2015)
Roberts v. Knab (Ohio 2012)
State ex rel. Austin v. Knab (Ohio 2010)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Donald Turner, for a writ of habeas corpus. Turner’s claim of nonjurisdictional sentencing errors is not cognizable in habeas corpus. See, e.g., Dunn v. Smith, 119 Ohio St.3d 364, 2008-Ohio-4565, 894 N.E.2d 312, ¶ 10. If, as Turner claims, the trial court refuses to issue a revised sentencing entry, he may compel the court to act through an action for a writ of mandamus or a writ of procedendo. Id. at ¶ 9.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.