In re M.M.
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- In re L.T. (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
[Cite as In re M.M., 122 Ohio St.3d 541, 2009-Ohio-4048.]
IN RE M.M. [Cite as In re M.M., 122 Ohio St.3d 541, 2009-Ohio-4048.] Certified question answered in the negative and judgment of the court of appeals affirmed on the authority of In re Schaefer. (Nos. 2009-0090 and 2009-0318 — Submitted July 14, 2009 — Decided August 18, 2009.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, Nos. 22872 and 22873, 2008-Ohio-6236. __________________ {¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the negative and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of In re Schaefer, 111 Ohio St.3d 498, 2006-Ohio-5513, 857 N.E.2d 532.
MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. __________________ Richard A. F. Lipowicz, for appellant Jessica Lairson.
Flanagan, Lieberman, Hoffman & Swaim and Richard Hempfling, for appellant Kathy Richards.
Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Johnna M. Shia, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee, Montgomery County Children Services. ______________________
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.