Nagel v. Huntington Natl. Bank
Nagel v. Huntington Natl. Bank
Opinion
[Cite as Nagel v. Huntington Natl. Bank, 122 Ohio St.3d 1227, 2009-Ohio-3451.]
NAGEL, APPELLEE, v. HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK, APPELLANT. [Cite as Nagel v. Huntington Natl. Bank, 122 Ohio St.3d 1227, 2009-Ohio-3451.]
Appeal dismissed as improvidently accepted. (No. 2008-2501 — Submitted July 14, 2009 — Decided July 21, 2009.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 90662, 179 Ohio App.3d 126, 2008-Ohio-5741. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.
MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. __________________ Dworken & Bernstein Co., L.P.A., and Patrick J. Perotti; and Brian G.
Ruschel, for appellee.
Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, L.L.P., Jennifer T. Mills, and L.
Bradfield Hughes, for appellant. ______________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.