Disciplinary Counsel v. Broeren

Ohio Supreme Court
Disciplinary Counsel v. Broeren, 2009 Ohio 2465 (Ohio 2009)
121 Ohio St. 3d 1241; 906 N.E.2d 1135
Moyer, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp

Disciplinary Counsel v. Broeren

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, P. Robert Broeren, Attorney Registration No. 0069166, last known business address in Gambier, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of October 10, 2007, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

-{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Broeren, 115 Ohio St.3d 473, 2007-Ohio-5251, 875 N.E.2d 935.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Reference

Status
Published