Ohio Supreme Court, 2009

State v. Petty

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 29, 2009 · Moyer, Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Cupp, Pfeifer, Lanzinger

2009 Ohio 1906; 121 Ohio St. 3d 607

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Petty (Ohio Ct. App. 2011)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed as to its ruling on appellant’s eleventh assignment of error below, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing consistent with State v. Bezak, 114 Ohio St.3d 94, 2007-Ohio-3250, 868 N.E.2d 961.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent and would not accept the appeal. *608 James J. Mayer Jr., Richland County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kirsten Pscholka-Gartner, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Shaw & Miller and Mark J. Miller, for appellant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.