Knowles v. Voorhies
Ohio Supreme Court
Knowles v. Voorhies, 2009 Ohio 1109 (Ohio 2009)
121 Ohio St. 3d 271; 903 N.E.2d 637
Moyer, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp
Knowles v. Voorhies
Opinion
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant, Howard L. Knowles, did not attach to his petition one of the bindover entries he challenges. Thus, his petition is fatally defective and subject to dismissal because he did not attach copies of all of his pertinent commitment papers. Goudlock v. Voorhies, 119 Ohio St.3d 398, 2008-Ohio-4787, 894 N.E.2d 692, ¶ 14.
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Knowles, Appellant, v. Voorhies, Warden, Appellee
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published