Ohio Supreme Court, 2009

Knowles v. Voorhies

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 18, 2009 · Moyer, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp

2009 Ohio 1109; 121 Ohio St. 3d 271; 903 N.E.2d 637

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

State ex rel. Jones v. Bradshaw (Ohio 2009)
Shie v. Smith (Ohio 2009)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant, Howard L. Knowles, did not attach to his petition one of the bindover entries he challenges. Thus, his petition is fatally defective and subject to dismissal because he did not attach copies of all of his pertinent commitment papers. Goudlock v. Voorhies, 119 Ohio St.3d 398, 2008-Ohio-4787, 894 N.E.2d 692, ¶ 14.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer,’ C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.