Knowles v. Voorhies

Ohio Supreme Court
Knowles v. Voorhies, 2009 Ohio 1109 (Ohio 2009)
121 Ohio St. 3d 271; 903 N.E.2d 637
Moyer, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp

Knowles v. Voorhies

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant, Howard L. Knowles, did not attach to his petition one of the bindover entries he challenges. Thus, his petition is fatally defective and subject to dismissal because he did not attach copies of all of his pertinent commitment papers. Goudlock v. Voorhies, 119 Ohio St.3d 398, 2008-Ohio-4787, 894 N.E.2d 692, ¶ 14.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer,’ C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Knowles, Appellant, v. Voorhies, Warden, Appellee
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published