Briseno v. Cook
Ohio Supreme Court
Briseno v. Cook, 121 Ohio St. 3d 38 (Ohio 2009)
901 N.E.2d 798
Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Stratton
Briseno v. Cook
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the habeas corpus petition of appellant, Antonio Briseno. Appellant had an adequate remedy by way of direct appeal from his sentence to raise his claim that he did not receive proper notification about postrelease control at his sentencing hearing. Patterson v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 120 Ohio St.3d 311, 2008-Ohio-6147, 898 N.E.2d 950, ¶ 8; Watkins v. Collins, 111 Ohio St.3d 425, 2006-Ohio-5082, 857 N.E.2d 78, ¶ 45 and 53.
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Briseno v. Cook, Warden
- Cited By
- 7 cases
- Status
- Published