Ohio Supreme Court, 2009

Briseno v. Cook

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 3, 2009 · Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Stratton

121 Ohio St. 3d 38; 901 N.E.2d 798

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

State Ex Rel. Castro v. Corrigan (Ohio 2011)
State ex rel. Shepherd v. Astrab (Ohio 2011)
State ex rel. Castro v. Corrigan (Ohio 2011)
State ex rel. Paige v. Corrigan (Ohio 2011)
State ex rel. Tucker v. Forchione (Ohio 2010)
State ex rel. Thomas v. DeWine (Ohio 2010)
State Ex Rel. Martin v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority (Ohio 2010)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the habeas corpus petition of appellant, Antonio Briseno. Appellant had an adequate remedy by way of direct appeal from his sentence to raise his claim that he did not receive proper notification about postrelease control at his sentencing hearing. Patterson v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 120 Ohio St.3d 311, 2008-Ohio-6147, 898 N.E.2d 950, ¶ 8; Watkins v. Collins, 111 Ohio St.3d 425, 2006-Ohio-5082, 857 N.E.2d 78, ¶ 45 and 53.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.