Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2009

State v. Omiecinski

State v. Omiecinski
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 30, 2009 · Accept, Appeal, Donnell, Holding, III, Law, Moyer, Nos, Only, Pfeifer, Proposition, Stratton
123 Ohio St. 3d 1405; 914 N.E.2d 203

State v. Omiecinski

Opinion of the Court

Cuyahoga App. No. 90510, 2009-Ohio-1066. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. II, III, IV, and V; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., would also accept Proposition of Law No. I without holding. Pfeifer, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. III and IV only. O’Donnell, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. III, IV, and V only.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑