Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2009

Foster v. State

Foster v. State
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 30, 2009 · Accept, Appeal, Connor, Cupp, Donnell, III, Law, Moyer, Nos, Only, Pfeifer, Proposition, Stratton, Vii, Would
123 Ohio St. 3d 1406; 914 N.E.2d 204

Foster v. State

Opinion of the Court

Hamilton App. No. C-080651. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, III, IV, V, and VI; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. VII. Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II only. Cupp, J., would not accept Proposition of Law No. III.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑