France v. Mattingly

Ohio Supreme Court October 12, 2009

France v. Mattingly, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1415 (Ohio 2009)

914 N.E.2d 1057

Await, Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Filing, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Response, Stratton

Opinion of the Court

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of the complaint and relator’s motion for immediate stay,

It is ordered by the court that the motion for stay is denied. It is further ordered that upon consideration pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5), this cause is dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor O’Donnell, and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and Cupp, JJ., dissent and would await the filing of a response.

Reference

Status: Published