Ohio Supreme Court, 2009

State v. Dye

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 18, 2009 · Accept, Appeal, Cupp, Donnell, III, Lanzinger, Law, Moyer, Nos, Pfeifer, Proposition, Stratton

123 Ohio St. 3d 1492; 916 N.E.2d 1073

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Dye (Ohio 2010)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Lake App. No. 2008-L-106, 2009-Ohio-2949. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. III. O’Donnell, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. II and III. Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.