Ohio Supreme Court, 2009

Pickaway Cty. Skilled Gaming L.L.C. v. Cordray

Pickaway Cty. Skilled Gaming L.L.C. v. Cordray
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 2, 2009 · Accept, Accepted, Appeal, Connor, Cross, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Law, Pfeifer, Proposition, Stratton, Would
123 Ohio St. 3d 1506; 917 N.E.2d 810
Pickaway Cty. Skilled Gaming L.L.C. v. Cordray

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Franklin App. No. 08AP-1032, 2009-Ohio-3483. Discretionary appeal not accepted.

Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent and would accept the appeal. Discretionary cross-appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II. Lundberg Stratton, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., would also accept the cross-appeal on Proposition of Law No. I. Pfeifer, O’Connor, and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent and would not accept the cross-appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.