State ex rel. Thomas v. DeWine

Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Thomas v. DeWine, 2010 Ohio 4984 (Ohio 2010)
127 Ohio St. 3d 214; 938 N.E.2d 328
Brown, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Cupp, Lanzinger

State ex rel. Thomas v. DeWine

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment dismissing the petition of appellant, Ako Thomas, for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas Judge Patrick DeWine, to resentence him in order to provide him oral notification at his sentencing hearing of his mandatory five-year postreleasecontrol term. Thomas “had an adequate remedy by way of direct appeal from his sentence to raise his claim that he did not receive proper notification about postrelease control at his sentencing hearing.” Briseno v. Cook, 121 Ohio St.3d 38, 2009-Ohio-308, 901 N.E.2d 798, ¶ 1.

Judgment affirmed.

Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., concurs in judgment only.

Reference

Full Case Name
The State Ex Rel. Thomas, Appellant, v. DeWine, Judge, Appellee
Cited By
6 cases
Status
Published