Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2010

State v. Satterfield

State v. Satterfield
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 4, 2010 · Moyer, Pfeifer, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Cupp, Stratton, Lanzinger, Singleton
2010 Ohio 725; 124 Ohio St. 3d 474; 923 N.E.2d 612

State v. Satterfield

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed as to the court of appeals’ holding on the retrospective application of H.B. 137 on the authority of State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009-Ohio-6434, 920 N.E.2d 958. R.C. 2929.191 may not be applied to a sentence entered prior to July 11, 2006.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Lanzinger, J., in State v. Singleton.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑