Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2010

State v. Armstrong

State v. Armstrong
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 4, 2010 · Moyer, Pfeifer, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Cupp, Stratton, Lanzinger, Singleton
2010 Ohio 724; 124 Ohio St. 3d 473; 923 N.E.2d 611

State v. Armstrong

Opinion

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered by our opinion in, and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of, State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009-Ohio-6434, 920 N.E.2d 958.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Lanzinger, J., in State v. Singleton. *474 William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Thorin Freeman, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑