Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2010

State v. Bailey

State v. Bailey
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 4, 2010 · Moyer, Pfeifer, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Cupp, Stratton, Lanzinger, Singleton
2010 Ohio 720; 124 Ohio St. 3d 443; 923 N.E.2d 150

State v. Bailey

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009-Ohio-6434, 920 N.E.2d 958, to the extent that the court of appeals held that R.C. 2929.191 could be applied in this case. R.C. 2929.191 may not be applied to a sentence entered prior to July 11, 2006.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Lanzinger, J., in State v. Singleton. *444 Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Paula E. Adams, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Christine Y. Jones, for appellant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑