Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2010

State v. Ross

State v. Ross
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 4, 2010 · Moyer, Pfeifer, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Cupp, Stratton, Lanzinger, Singleton
2010 Ohio 719; 124 Ohio St. 3d 471; 923 N.E.2d 609

State v. Ross

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009-Ohio-6434, 920 N.E.2d 958, to the extent that the court of appeals held that R.C. 2929.191 could be applied in this case. R.C. 2929.191 may not be applied to a sentence entered prior to July 11, 2006.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Lanzinger, J., in State v. Singleton. *472 Thomas L. Sartini, Ashtabula County Prosecuting Attorney, and Shelley M. Pratt, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Ashtabula County Public Defender Office, Inc., and Marie Lane, for appellant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑