Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2010

State v. McKay

State v. McKay
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 4, 2010 · Moyer, Pfeifer, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Cupp, Stratton, Lanzinger, Singleton
2010 Ohio 718; 124 Ohio St. 3d 442; 923 N.E.2d 149

State v. McKay

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009-Ohio-6434, 920 N.E.2d 958, to the extent that the court of appeals held that R.C. 2929.191 could be applied in this case. R.C. 2929.191 may not be applied to a sentence entered prior to July 11, 2006.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Lanzinger, J., in State v. Singleton.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑