Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2010

State v. Porter

State v. Porter
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 4, 2010 · Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Fuller, Her, Lanzinger, Moyer, Ohio, Pfeifer, Stated, Stratton
124 Ohio St. 3d 1237; 925 N.E.2d 139

State v. Porter

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The motion for reconsideration is granted to the following extent: The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. II.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009-Ohio-6434, 920 N.E.2d 958.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., concurs for the reasons stated in her concurring opinion in State v. Fuller, 124 Ohio St.3d 543, 2010-Ohio-726. Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Fuller, 124 Ohio St.3d 543, 2010-Ohio-726.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑