Ohio Supreme Court, 2010

State v. Bundy

State v. Bundy
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 10, 2010 · Accept, Appeal, Cupp, Holding, Lanzinger, Law, Moyer, Pfeifer, Proposition
124 Ohio St. 3d 1473; 921 N.E.2d 245
State v. Bundy

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Montgomery App. Nos. 23063 and 23064, 2009-Ohio-5395. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., and Lanzinger, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II without holding. Pfeifer and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.