Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2010

State ex rel. Gaylor, Inc. v. Goodenow

State ex rel. Gaylor, Inc. v. Goodenow
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 25, 2010 · Cupp, Direct, Grant, Motion, Motions, Parties, Pfeifer, Response, Ruling, Schedule
124 Ohio St. 3d 1525; 923 N.E.2d 624

State ex rel. Gaylor, Inc. v. Goodenow

Opinion of the Court

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration of respondents’ motion to require relator to give a bond and emergency motion for expedited briefing schedule,

It is ordered by the court that the motions are denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents and would grant the motions. Cupp, J., would defer ruling on the motion for bond until relator files a response and would direct the parties to submit a proposed expedited briefing schedule.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑