Ohio Supreme Court, 2010

State ex rel. Cummings v. Brunner

State ex rel. Cummings v. Brunner
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 25, 2010 · Deny, Motions, Pfeifer, Protective
124 Ohio St. 3d 1525; 923 N.E.2d 625

State ex rel. Cummings v. Brunner

Opinion of the Court

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of New Models’ motions for protective order and for sanctions, and the motion for protective order of LetOhioVote.org,

It is ordered by the court that the motions for protective order are granted, and the motion for sanctions will be considered at the time of the merits determination.

Pfeifer, J., dissents and would deny the motions for protective order.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.