Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2010

Hungerford v. State

Hungerford v. State
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 14, 2010 · Accept, Appeal, Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Law, Moyer, Nos, Pfeifer, Proposition, Stratton, Vii, Viii, Would
124 Ohio St. 3d 1539; 924 N.E.2d 843

Hungerford v. State

Opinion of the Court

Lake App. No. 2008-L-073, 2009-Ohio-6997. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I-IV, VII, IX, and X; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., would not accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. X. Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. V, VI, and VIII. O’Connor and Cupp, JJ., would not accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. VII. Lanzinger, J., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑