Ohio Supreme Court, 2010

In re Bartok

In re Bartok
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 19, 2010 · Pfeifer
124 Ohio St. 3d 1550; 925 N.E.2d 141

In re Bartok

Opinion of the Court

Cuyahoga App. No. 92775. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. On November 13, 2009, appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.4(A)(4), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.4(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.4(C), It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within fourteen days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 3.6.

Pfeifer, Acting C.J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.