Ohio Supreme Court, 2010

Smith v. Inland Paperboard & Packaging, Inc.

Smith v. Inland Paperboard & Packaging, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 8, 2010 · Brown, Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Metal, Opinions, Pfeifer, Prods, Servs, Stated, Stratton
126 Ohio St. 3d 64; 930 N.E.2d 319
Smith v. Inland Paperboard & Packaging, Inc.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Kaminski v. Metal & Wire Prods. Co., 125 Ohio St.3d 250, 2010-Ohio-1027, 927 N.E.2d 1066, and Stetter v. R.J. Corman Derailment Servs., L.L.C., 125 Ohio St.3d 280, 2010-Ohio-1029, 927 N.E.2d 1092.

{¶ 2} Appellant’s motion for full briefing and argument or, in the alternative, for remand is denied.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Kaminski v. Metal & Wire Prods. Co. and R.J. Corman Derailment Servs. Brown, C.J., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.