Ohio Supreme Court, 2010

State v. Adkins

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided August 25, 2010 · Cupp, Grant, Lanzinger, Law, Motion, Pfeifer, Proposition, Stratton

126 Ohio St. 3d 1551; 932 N.E.2d 343

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Adkins (Ohio 2011)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Delaware App. No. 09 CAA 02 0012, 2010-Ohio-307. Reported at 125 Ohio St.3d 1448, 2010-Ohio-2510, 927 N.E.2d 1128. On motion for reconsideration. The motion is granted to the following extent: The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. II.

Lundberg Stratton, J., would also grant the motion as to Proposition of Law No. I. Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.