Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2010

Conley v. Faurecia Exhaust Systems, Inc.

Conley v. Faurecia Exhaust Systems, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 2, 2010 · Accept, Appeal, Brown, Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Pfeifer, Stratton, Would
127 Ohio St. 3d 122; 936 N.E.2d 960

Conley v. Faurecia Exhaust Systems, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Pettiford v. Aggarwal, 126 Ohio St.3d 413, 2010-Ohio-3237, 934 N.E.2d 913, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings consistent with Pettiford v. Aggarwal.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent and would not accept the discretionary appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑