Ohio Supreme Court, 2010

Conley v. Faurecia Exhaust Systems, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 2, 2010 · Accept, Appeal, Brown, Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Pfeifer, Stratton, Would

127 Ohio St. 3d 122; 936 N.E.2d 960

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Conley v. Faurecia Exhaust Sys., Inc. (Ohio Ct. App. 2011)
Conley v. Faurecia Exhaust Sys., Inc. (Ohio 2010)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Pettiford v. Aggarwal, 126 Ohio St.3d 413, 2010-Ohio-3237, 934 N.E.2d 913, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings consistent with Pettiford v. Aggarwal.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent and would not accept the discretionary appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.