Ohio Supreme Court, 2010

Janosek v. Janosek

Janosek v. Janosek
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 1, 2010
127 Ohio St. 3d 1424; 936 N.E.2d 72

Janosek v. Janosek

Opinion of the Court

Cuyahoga App. No. 91882, 2009-Ohio-3882. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for leave to correct a statement at oral argument,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Appellant’s motion for leave is deemed sufficient notice of the misstatement, and no further filings are required.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.