Ohio Supreme Court, 2010

State ex rel. Murray v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Elections

State ex rel. Murray v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Elections
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 15, 2010 · Pfeifer
127 Ohio St. 3d 1433; 936 N.E.2d 963

State ex rel. Murray v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Elections

Opinion of the Court

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus/prohibition involving an expedited election matter. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the parties shall comply with the following schedule: respondents’ answer is due Thursday, November 18; relator’s brief and evidence are due Tuesday, November 23; respondents’ brief and evidence are due Monday, November 29; and relator’s reply brief is due Tuesday, November 30.

The parties shall serve all documents filed in this case by personal service, facsimile transmission, or e-mail on the date of the filing. The Clerk’s office shall refuse to file any requests for extension of time in this case.

Pfeifer, Acting C.J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.