Ohio Supreme Court, 2010

Disciplinary Counsel v. Friedman

Disciplinary Counsel v. Friedman
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 6, 2010
127 Ohio St. 3d 1451

Disciplinary Counsel v. Friedman

Opinion of the Court

On November 4, 2010, respondent, Benjamin Stuart Friedman, filed an application for termination of probation. Upon consideration thereof, the court finds that respondent has substantially complied with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D) and with its order, dated March 9, 2009, in which the court reinstated respondent to the practice of law and placed him on probation. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by this court that the probation of respondent, Benjamin Stuart Friedman, Attorney Registration No. 0074348, last known business address in Kingman, Arizona, is terminated.

It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.